I was lying in bed yesterday and thinking about which I prefer in a game. For me personally it comes down to gameplay simply because that is what keeps you coming back for more time and time again. I guess that’s why I have no problem firing up some of my favourite retro titles every now and then like many others and why Nintendo’s Virtual Console has done so well up to this point.
In the early days of gaming having realistic graphics wasn’t an option and while there were games that pushed the bar in terms of graphics, it was the gameplay that kept you entertained. Which brings me to the point of why I play games at all; simply to have fun. Give me a game with great graphics but if the gameplay isn’t solid then I will no doubt lose interest relatively quickly. I believe a balance has to be struck, yes have the nice graphics but don’t sacrifice the gameplay because of it.
I believe many developers fall into the trap of thinking if their game doesn’t look amazing, that it won’t sell and perhaps devoting less time developing the core gameplay. Too many times have I picked up a game that looked interesting and it had all the graphical bells and whistles, but the gameplay wasn’t worth 2 cents. Who is to blame for this? I fear too many consumers let the poor gameplay slide because they have the nice graphics and that’s why I partly blame them, but then everyone wants different things from their gaming experience I suppose. That is however a whole other topic for debating.
This is a more prominent argument now that we are in the ‘next generation’ where everything is supposed to look better. This in itself I find interesting as most associate next gen to visuals but I believe a true next gen experience should encompass more than just graphics. Where is the next gen gameplay? that’s what I want to know. While many see Nintendo’s effort with the Wii as gimmicky, I think it is more of a leap in gaming than what the 360 or PS3 are doing. Now don’t get me wrong I’m not saying those consoles aren’t good but what are they really doing that’s making your gaming experience different aside from having better looking games?
I find it interesting to listen to people when they classify what a good game is and why they think it is good. More often than not it’s usually because of the game’s visuals. I believe if a developer can pull off the graphics + gameplay then by all means and kudos to them. I’ve been considered harsh when it comes to judging games as I am not easily won over by graphics alone, so if that’s all there is to a game then it probably won’t deserve any of my time. I don’t have time to waste on poor controls and sloppy gameplay especially if it’s not fun regardless of how it looks.
When you get down to it, gaming essentially should be an enjoyable interactive experience. A combination of graphics, gameplay, story (if appropriate), sound and controls which should compliment each other to form a nice balance.